The applicants argued that respondent No. 1 had currently received his due share with the deceased’s estate for the duration of his lifetime through a present (hiba), and so was not entitled to more share. Even so, the applicants did not present any tangible evidence exhibiting that respondent No. And https://affordablelawyerindhakara27752.ampedpages.com/the-definitive-guide-to-affordable-lawyer-in-dha-karachi-59287922